RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:WallstreetTXRogers wrote: Wallstreet1112 wrote: Ayogan11 wrote: Hi Tx. I’m not asking him how it came about as for sure thats complex. Asking why he would bet the farm that it will come in above 5g over a mineable height. Because even though it could be very big it could also be lower than economic grade, in particular when its underground.
I guess that was for me?
1. Conglomerates seem thicker "down dip" as per QH's statements
2. From what they are seeing it's 3-4m+ in thickness
3. Bulk samples seem to have shifted from 4x4m to 2x2m
4. QH sait it looked "robust" and mentioned "routinely" in the P&P interview
Grade is just an approximation out of "robust", "routinely", "nugget abundance" and the 2x2 sample horizon.
Hi HH. You, above all know this is just the tip of the iceberg. The more uniformly distributed Precipitated fine Gold will likely start to appear down dip and grades will be easier to pin down on a large area scale. For now, we simply have to accept the wild unpredictability of a mega scale coarse gold alluvial deposit. Keep up your outstanding work BTW. For retailers, you are a wonderful asset towards this investment. Tx
Hey TX,
The patchy chloritic shale sure is interesting. I guess we might find a sequence with more of this, but intact, and that might be our "carbon seam" type thing. (Just speculating here).
And I agree, the coarseness should not be a problem, especially given the size this looks to become.
Thanks for the kind words, and I can only say the same! Good to hear that not everyone thinks I'm just a pumper ^^.
Best regards,
HH