I Still Don't Understand the Valuations So what are the Nuuvera intangible assets worth? What valuation technique used in a fairness opinion can conclude that initially $826m and then ultimately $425m are both "fair"? What valuation technique allows for a range of fair prices that is 49% different in a matter of weeks? Would the same fairness opinion provider and same valuation technique have concluded that $100m was the fair value of the assets acquired if the Aphria share price had fallen further. At what price would the Nuuvera Board say, "sorry that is below what we know our assets to be worth"? Alternatively, what kind of valuation approach did the Aphria Board consider when they agreed to pay $826m of shareholder value to get the Nuuvera assets. It looks like they were being pretty generous in that they ultimately acquired these same assets for 49% less - in a month???