The way I see it.FWIW
Citrix has the advantage of being able to hire the most talented legal team, as they were most successful in business using the technology. Whether or not they infringed in our eyes or not they were better business people, affording them the best legal protection.
I kind of thought that it was an admission of guilt on their part when they sent the patent back to the USPTO. So when the patent was validated by the USPTO I thought we had the advantage.
Whether or not 01 was able to make billions with the patent or not, doesn't detract from their legitimacy as developers of the technology.
I doubt if Citrix was able to create their own method of operation without the use, of our technology.
But when such a highly technical issue is left in the hands of such average lay people as that of the jury, it isn't surprising how a more sophisticated legal team could get them to believe that there is no patent violation.
Whether or not the presiding Judges will be as easily swayed is anyone's guess.
It is taking a rather long time for them to decide what should be done in this case though.
GLTA