RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:PrometicYou're wrong. Resistance can(does) cause non-response but not all non-response is caused by resistance that was my point, your thinking is too limited on this subject.
For example read this and get more informed.
https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines/html/1/adult-and-adolescent-arv/367/overview Hopefully somebody will repost this for your own good.
jfm1330 wrote: You are on my ignore list. But when you are quoted by somebody else I can still read falsehoods. Resistance and not responding to a drug is the same thing. The good thing is not that they don't talk about resistance, they do in other words. The good thing is that they just say not reponding to
several drugs and failing their current therapy.
Resistance to two drugs fits the several drugs definition and there is no words about three classes or several classes. So in theory a patient resistant to two drugs in the same class could be prescribed Trogarzo. It won't happen since it would make no medical and economic sense. But clearly the door is wide open for patients resistant to two drugs in two classes and resistant to other ARV drugs.
No need to answer me. You are on my ignore list.
SPCEO1 wrote: PoorOpinion wrote:
TROGARZO is a drug for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) infection in adults who:
- have received several anti-HIV-1 regimens in the past, and
- have HIV-1 virus that is not responding to many antiretroviral medicines, and
- who are failing their current antiretroviral therapy
HIV-1 is the virus that causes AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome)."
Somehow those three bullet points look even simpler than the label doc, not even a mention of resistance. The salespeople should have those tatooed on the inside of their eyelids.