RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Bangkokboyyayoportillo wrote: I had to go back over my post. Indeed I did a use that vicious pejorative snowflake. Sorry. Frankly I thought it was a pretty accurate reflection of your need to put every poster who has an alternate opinion on mute. Seems pretty snowflaky. Anywho, I do see most of your posts and would say you’re hardly the company critic. Which is fine by me. In particular your post AGM post was quite pro company as I remember. To the point you were satisfied with what you heard and felt more sure about your position. Which is also fine. But please don’t go taking the “I’m the Ralph Nader” of Yfi position.
Bangkokboy wrote: yayoportillo wrote: Sometimes. You. Have. To. Wonder.
There are no logical signs pointing to this having to succeed. Just the opposite. Tech developed and unsold since 2003. Small. Undercapitalized. No market recognition. I could gone on and on.
The real gem however is the thing about the bashers winning. First get over the basher thing snowflake. Maybe if you didn’t put every “basher” on ignore you might learn something. Or at least allow a contrary thought to invade your isolated little world. But more germain, bashers don’t win. The game isn’t between people who disagree it’s between you and the market. You win or lose on that basis. Bashers as you call them get bragging rights maybe. But who cares about that. Me, I care about the money. Somehow I’m left thinking you’re the guy who won’t sell on principle. Because you need to be right. A terrific recipe for disaster. So take a tip. Quit worrying about bashers and more about why a company that has never had decent sales, always misses targets, discloses zip, pays pseudo press to talk up their tech and finally but not lastly issues press releases about big happenings that never are heard from again.
Bangkokboy wrote: Yes, I only have myself to blame for not taking anything off the table when I wanted to. Getting on base is smarter than swinging for the fences, I know that, I guess I'm not playing the game optimally. I still believe in the tech, but this patience game is a b!tch and this is far from over. I just can't stand to see the bashers win when in fact all the logical signs are pointing for the company to succeed. I believe I know who you are but this is not why I'm responding as I wanted to hear this so I can regroup. No pie in the sky, just something to ponder.
Yeah, thanks for the tip yoyo, since we're calling names here. If you knew my posting history then you'd know I wasn't so pro company. Who were you at the AGM so you could call out the company? Hmm, maybe because you were not there and I was doing this. Please go and reincarnate yourself again.
For the record, not everyone that has an alternate view of mine is considered a basher since I like content that is debatable. It's just when posts appear blatantly one sided, It's my way or the highway, type that it's difficult to debate. Yes, should have said pumpers too, as no one likes the "too the moon" types. I have voiced my concerns with the company but It's obvious what you've read here is a soft bash compared to what others have said. I'm still positive but can totally understand others views. I retract the childish name I had mentioned. I like the Ralph Nader ref, name from the past, but personally I don't agree. I agree that we need more content that can be debated with both positive/negative are welcomed.