GREY:SNNVF - Post by User
Comment by
sunrizeon Apr 05, 2018 1:42pm
115 Views
Post# 27837292
RE:RE:RE:RE:Any new articles?
RE:RE:RE:RE:Any new articles?I did not select an arbitrary random date. Go to that chart link and do a 3 month comparison or 4 month or whenever it went to trade on the markets.
It's not that hard, I am telling you. Spend some time analyzing that chart 20 different ways if you want, the facts don't lie.
And you have brilliantly ignored my other comments, after yourself asking me to comment about O'Pumper's articles. I see what you did there.
Sunniva4Life wrote: Brilliant comparison chart, sunrize. Do you maybe want to try again, from the day Sunniva went public and not from an arbitrarily selected, random date? On January 10, WEED was 42. It is now 27.6. SNN was 7.4. It is now 8.18. And WEED is another stock that Ohashi has consistently recommended and still does recommend, or "Pump" as you would call it, so I'm not sure what your point is.
sunrize wrote: Comparing to Canopy (after all, in Ted O'Pumper's own words, Sunniva is the Canopy of Calif), you better read this chart comparison because your "crashed with the rest of the sector" does not hold water):
CHART COMPARISON Ah, one more thing: O'Pumper was adamant that a good buy point was $12 (he upped his target from $10 to $12 (I think it was USD but may be it was CAN) but nonetheless, after his paid visit to Calif.
Plus his insistence that the bought deal financing news would cause only a small dip for a day or so (if at all) before recovering. I know no one should buy on his recommendation, yada yada yada, but to have his pump article show up on the company website is well, not ethical.
Sunniva4Life wrote: Stock was up 8% after Ted's last article. It didn't last and SNN crashed with the rest of the sector. This decline isn't company-specific. Do you have any substantive criticism about anything he wrote in regards to Sunniva?