Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s): FCUUF

Energy

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.

TSX:FCU - Post by User

Fission Uranium Corp

Bullboard Posts

Comment by CanadaBckon Apr 06, 2018 10:05am

96 Views

Post# 27841988

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Upside Galore

And how many times have you been kicked off stockhouse? Gotta be 4 or 5 at least and back on with a new ID. Several ID's huh. Same old agenda. Bash Fission management and nuclear.
Does Garrett pay you?
I'm sure FCU will see a new 52 week high this summer, no matter how much bashing you and your aliases do.

199930 wrote: This coming from someone who admits to having multiple aliases.

Gigantapithic wrote: Making things up for the sole purpose of bashing.

199930 wrote: Might not make sense to you, but the market obvioulsy prefers NXE over FCU. Probably has a lot to do with management.

settoretire wrote: NXE flying today. Why?
What do investors see in NXE that I don’t. I have done quite well on most of my investments, and pride myself in doing DD before investing.
Nexgens #’s don’t add up to a $2.40 share price. What have I missed? The “ under a lake “ argument is moot. Half the cost of building a super deep shaft. Inferred resource. Does not make sense at all.