RE:RE:RE:N43-101radar17 wrote:
Except I never said they had ALL the assays back, I even posted the excerpt from their NR that stated that. All I said is they have assays back from the drill program and they simply weren't worth releasing. The best defense the pumpers could come up with was that they were trying to save the money it would cost to put out a NR - which is laughable if the assays they did have were in any way newsworthy.
And YOU accuse me of trying to twist words???
I didn’t read your trail of posts but I will confidently come to the conclusion you are a f**king moron. Why are you convoluting the situation and saying the assays are “bad” when no one outside the company (blackout) knows. It’s your subjective, biased perception which is of course negative from the get go. The technical team, geologists, perform quality control on the assays from the lab before releasing to the public. They don’t just receive assays from a third party lab and release without due diligence before publishing in a NR. Did it occur to you that the assays aren’t “bad” and perhaps they’re just waiting for the final, delayed sample batch from the lab, will then perform quality control, and then release ALL assays at once? Beyond that metallurgy tests would be done to check recoveries which will be added to the NI 43-101 along with the recent assays. Are you seriously this egocentric and f**king dumb? Why was one batch perhaps delayed? There is many possible reasons but it doesn’t mean “bad”. You stupid f**ker.
-Longshot