GREY:ATBPF - Post by User
Comment by
PoorOpinionon Apr 24, 2018 12:02pm
130 Views
Post# 27932457
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Pooropinion, good post, do you know Naproxen's CV profile
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Pooropinion, good post, do you know Naproxen's CV profile KrispyBacon wrote: Edcando - first off i appreciate how often you post and how pro-ATE you are. This is by no means a bashing post, but one to put a check on yours.
I think Poor is looking for a bit more scientific/factual based response, rather than just half dose = better. That is not good enough for the FDA....
Yes, 2b results exceeded expectations, but was not directly related to cv. Just because 2b exceeded expectations does not mean any tests they havent specifically done yet will be the same.... With that logic we could say this drug helps cure cancer as well!! (a boy can dream).
Meaningful data would be something like 10,000 patients in phase 3 took x dosage for x time and there was no significant cv change with a p value of .0001 (just for example).
I like Edcando's points. ATB346 already does have things going for it as he points out, the lower dose is definitely one of them. I'm not bashing ATB-346 I just want to undrrstand what the FDA position is on the CV problem. Get some understanding here, know how Antibe plan to answer the questions, see the data and move closer to the "slam dunk" :)