Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Royal Nickel Corp. RNKLF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals


GREY:RNKLF - Post by User

Royal Nickel Corp. > Extremely Undervalued Company with Giant Nickel Deposit
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by AlternativeViewon Apr 25, 2018 9:26pm
135 Views
Post# 27941698

RE:RE:Extremely Undervalued Company with Giant Nickel Deposit

RE:RE:Extremely Undervalued Company with Giant Nickel DepositI find this to be a strange comment to be on the board of RNC, a company with a CEO who repeatedly said that this distinction is BS for 2 reasons.  First, a lot of Class 1 nickel now goes into SS and can be repurposed for batteries, and second, ungrading NPI to Class 1 requires only a simple change to the flowsheet.

Maybe you should read some of RNC's presentations,

Not2Sirius wrote: Jules, not trying to discredit what you wrote, but I recall looking into FPX and finding out it was not the class 1 type of nickel that would be useable in EV batteries, rather it was NPI or something else less valuable.  Please correct me if I’m wrong because it’s been a while and I am maybe misremembering.


<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities