Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd C.FAT

Alternate Symbol(s):  FMST

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd, formerly Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd., is a uranium and lithium exploration company with interests in 10 prospective properties spanning over 330,000 acres in the prolific, uranium-rich Athabasca Basin. The Company also maintains a secondary portfolio of lithium projects at different stages of development spanning over 50,000 acres across Manitoba and Quebec. Seven properties comprise its Easern Athabasca Uranium Properties, which include Murphy Lake South, Hatchet Lake, Turkey Lake, Torwalt, Marten, Wolverine and Epp Lake. Its Blue-Sky uranium projects located within the western portion span approximately 102,000 hectares in the Athabasca Basin consisting of three projects: Blackwing, GR Property and CLK Property. Its lithium projects include Zoro Lithium Project, Jean Lake Lithium-Gold Project, Peg North Project, Grass River Claims Project, and Jol Lithium Project. Winston Group of Properties is its Gold and Silver Project.


CSE:FAT - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Anonxmason May 08, 2018 10:02pm
45 Views
Post# 28001954

RE:RE:RE:RE:Question for Radar

RE:RE:RE:RE:Question for RadarIt’s a simple question Radar - what constitutes a poor, average or good NI 43-101? If I knew the assays and depths I’d figure out the exact results myself, but you have already told us that the NI43-101 will be poor. You can’t back up your bashing. Proof here it is folks, Radar can’t tell you what to do. He deflects from straight up easy question, but claims to save you.

radar17 wrote:
You pretending to be an idiot?  Tell ya what - you get to us all the assays the company neglected to release. While you're at it maybe get the true thickness of the intercepts they likewise kinda "forgot" to include.

Then I'll answer your question.


Bullboard Posts