Stockhouse postings are probably monitored by PAT's PR guy. There is a concern that the truths I've shared will eventually get a wider audience on the Facebook Group. This is why the CEO needs a few days to draft a letter and carefully avoid the topics I've listed below. Just like Mike270 and his wife, BlameOG, always try to chance the subject whenever I present a truth or fact. Those 2 lovers remind me of Beavis & Butthead but with a less hair.
Let's all hope the CEO addresses the following:
1) Why they don't have an actual Utility Patent for the technology in any country.
2) Why Michael Rozin is no longer listed as part of the leadership team.
3) Why the FCC and IC state that this product may only be used by law enforcement and EMS.
4) Why this product will be expensive to implement because each location will require the hiring of law enforcement to operate the unit.....unless they expect thousands of volunteers.
5) Why this product is NOT plug & play technology because each location will require custom installers to calibrate the device for the environment (background) and the expect pedestrian traffic (target profiles). Remember the old physics classes on signal detection? This is time consuming work and the price point needs to be much higher than $10K. They will not be able to make installed sales target even with the help of a Tier 1 like Smith Detection. oops...i forgot to mention that Smith Detection is not interested. They had a chance to takeover the project back when Natalie Nikolova was doing the work under the NATO grant. Unitedeye? It will take these guys 10 years to fulfill a backlog of 500 units.
6) Why the project's "estimated" commercial release has been push back from Q2 to Q4.