Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Amaya Inc. T.TSGI


Primary Symbol: AYA

The Stars Group Inc is an online and mobile gaming company with poker, gaming, and betting product offerings. These products are offered both, directly and indirectly, under-owned or licensed gaming brands, and the company also owns several live poker tour and events brands. The firm's primary sources of revenue are its online gaming businesses. The company has three segments based on geography: International, United Kingdom, and Australia. Stars Group generates the majority of its revenue...


NDAQ:AYA - Post by User

Comment by Narrishkeiton May 17, 2018 12:16pm
108 Views
Post# 28046293

RE:Kentucky Case Review

RE:Kentucky Case Review
solarman2013 wrote: I was able to obtain, which anyone can for $20, the recording of the entire proceedings of the April 18th appearance before the Kentucky Court of Appeals. As many would say, there is much to read into the questions posed by judges, and as we’ve seen in the SC situation, the questions did reflect the eventual decision quite closely.

Well if that is the case here, then if I was the lawyer for the other side, I’d cut a deal fast. The judges said they’d render a decision within 90 days, even though they had no limit they had to restrict themselves to. They asked great questions which consistently pleased the lawyer arguing for Stars. This should have been a sign that it wont be too hard for them to decide and that if a deal is to be done, it has to be before mid July.

Once this monkey is off their backs, majors will come pouring in as the derisking of legacy issues by Rafi and team will pretty much be complete.


Am I missing something? Do you have a  summary of the key questions and your analysis?

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>