Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd. T.KGI


Primary Symbol: T.KL

Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd is a Canada-based gold mining, development, and exploration company with a diversified portfolio of exploration projects. The production profile of the company includes the Macassa mine complex located in northeastern Ontario and the Fosterville gold mine located in the State of Victoria, Australia. Also, the company owns the Holt mine and the Detour mine. The company's mines and material mineral projects are located in Canada and Australia.


TSX:KL - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by PulpCutteron May 18, 2018 11:22am
47 Views
Post# 28052500

Canadian mkts closed Monday (if I have my facts straight)...

Canadian mkts closed Monday (if I have my facts straight)...Question w/Novo is knowing where NOT to extract ore.  In other words, coming up with some method to determine where the ore is rich enough to expend money extracting/shipping/processing, and where you shouldn't.  Pretty clear, as TM & ES said, and as fossikers have known for decades, that "the gold is there" and that it spreads over 100s of kilometers.  Questions are 1) is it uniform enough that you can simply start dilling & milling profitably (unlikely, but who knows?), and 2) if it is no uniform enough, how do you tell where you should NOT dig?

Excuse my skepticism, but after a long, long time of working at the intersection of research & product development, have seen way too many cases where there were just one or two technical leaps that were needed.  Those missing steps never solved, and tens of millions in ven cap money to got excreted down the toiled.  Seen it again & again & again, with language and promises along the way that are disturbingly like QH's pronouncements, right down to the "I've been in this industry a long time & I know it's important to always be conservative".  The liars ALL say that.  I am not claiming QH is a liar, here.  No slander out of me.  I am expressing my OPINION as an investor, that the set of facts put forward, and more importantly the ommissions from those sets of facts (stuff that IMO should be there, and is not), and the tone of the remarks, sounds way, way too familiar.  E.g., where are the results from the other samples.  QH always presents from a few samples; with no statement on whether or not these are the results from all samples collected, or just cherry picking.  Novo "investors" blithely ignore this OBVIOUS sign.  Why do other explorers give comprehensive lists of their assays, with "NV" on many of them?  It's not like lack of uniformity should be trivial to an investor; it is THE key criteria in the economic viability of the deposit.  Again, we've known "the gold is there", for decades.

There's a REASON that the big, successful Aussie miners are not all over this one. 
Bullboard Posts