Hugo just posted on the FB site. Thought id post it here Hi everyone, I wanted to jump on here to answer a few questions regarding some of the items that people have voiced concern or confusion about. Things are as hectic as ever at the office today as we try to get caught up after the Lift conference and expo so please excuse my brevity. 1. Beleave Equity - what we currently have with Beleave is a DOPE Note which does not entail equity (I've explained mechanics in a previous post). We also have a "second site" streaming agreement with Beleave that provides that when Beleave and CBW agree on a piece of land we will develop a project on that land that will be licensed under the second site procedures. That project will be undertaken in a JV company and CBW and Beleave would own all of equity in that JV company (similar to the Quiring JV) and CBW will get half of the production. We are in regular contact with Beleave and intend to the do the second site JV at some point. Right now Beleave is understandably focused on completing it's greenhouse expansion and we have a lot to do as well so while both parties remain committed to the project, it's not imminent. 2. The video - I have not seen the BNN video and, frankly, don't intend to waste my time with it. For those of you who have done some research on CBW you will know that we have had plenty of haters and detractors who enjoy going on BNN, Midas Letter type of shows and making accusations about how we're all bad people with no interest in running a company beyond enriching ourselves and our friends. As we've continue to make progress in our business plan and prove those detractors wrong, some of those people may feel the need to up the temperature of their comments so that they can continue to try and remain relevant. We have a very simple way of responding - we don't respond. We keep our heads down, put one foot in front of the other every day and execute on our plan. Ultimately our success is the only response we need. When we closed our financing in June 2017 our fully diluted market cap was ~$350M. Today, almost a year later it's ~$1.05B. So, we're not responding to the video and we don't plan on responding to anything similar to the video unless we're legally required to respond. If you're the type of person that puts greater stock in the rantings of some guy on BNN as opposed to the underwriting and reputational judgement of Bank of Montreal, then a response from us was unlikely to have lessened your concern in any event. 3. Ongoing disclosure - our company complies with all of its continuous disclosure obligations imposed by securities laws, corporate laws and our exchanges. In fact, we go over and above those requirements. The fact that I'm on this board answering your questions is evidence of that. The fact that social media and modern communications give shareholders more direct access to management doesn't mean that disclosure standards have changed. I don't mind shareholders reaching out to me and asking for clarifications, but I have no intention of issuing a press release or posting clarification every time that management makes a business decision or something non-material happens. For example, I've seen posts asking what the status of the Quiring JV is and positing that because the exclusivity period has now expired there should either be a press release or else it's indicative of something bad happening with a deal. No, what's happened is that both teams have been working diligently towards transaction close on the definitive agreements and moving the actual project forward as quickly as possible. The tax structuring on the JV took longer than either party anticipated so we extended the exclusivity date - as is normal and customary practice when both parties are working on a deal and run up against the expiry of the exclusivity period. I am not going to announce those sorts of things as it would hugely draining on my already constrained bandwidth and, in some instances, may be be competitively sensitive information. I would like to think that when you invested in CBW you invested in part because you trust management to make sound business decisions to increase the value of your equity. If that trust is not there, then we fully understand if you would rather deploy your capital into an investment other than CBW. However, our focus is not going to change - we're going to continue to make decisions based on what we think is in the best interests of the corporation and our shareholders. While we will try to enhance our ongoing disclosure in the future with things like quarterly calls we are not going to fundamentally alter our disclosure practices just because people have a forum to complain that they don't know enough and feel like we should disclose more. 4. Pictures - we rented a house off-strip in Vegas for the November conference and we hosted a party. MNP, Aurora, Bennett Jones each pitched in for the party expenses. The owner of the house had a garage filled with all sorts of props that he uses at parties and the owner and his crew rolled out these burnt-out, no engine lamborghini shells that had been painted over and spray painted on and told us that it was a fun party accessory as guests could spray paint the cars on their way in or out of the party. We said sure - it was no extra cost and sounded like a fun idea. Chuck, out of a desire to document our CBW journey, routinely takes pictures of us during moments that he thinks we'll want to look back on in the future (he's built a number of successful companies before and said that one of his regrets is not having more pictures of the journey so he's determined to not let that happen with CBW). Out of a genuine desire to share that with this forum Chuck periodically posts pictures of us. The intention is not to upset the members of this board and since I can see that the posting of pictures is having the opposite effect, we apologize for this and will immediately stop posting pictures. Hope the above helps. Happy to answer other questions, time permitting.