Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. PGDIF

"Peregrine Diamonds Ltd is a diamond exploration and development company with interests in diamond exploration properties located at Nunavut and the Northwest Territories in Canada and The Republic of Botswana."


GREY:PGDIF - Post by User

Post by Kidlapikon Jun 06, 2018 3:52pm
156 Views
Post# 28134746

10% for $50mil?

10% for $50mil?
So say PGD cannot come to terms with a major miner for 50% or more of the project due to the disappointing market conditions or that some of them are just finished large expenses. De Beers just finished off Gacho Kue, DDC got a buy-out, Stornoway just getting ramped up that sort of thing. Is there any precedence for a financer such as a Sprott to take a minority position in a project to move forward? Such as a 10% equity stake at say $40-50million?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>