Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

FPX Nickel Corp. V.FPX

Alternate Symbol(s):  FPOCF

FPX Nickel Corp. is a Canada-based junior nickel mining company. The Company is focused on the exploration and development of the Decar Nickel District, located in central British Columbia, and other occurrences of the same style of naturally occurring nickel-iron alloy mineralization known as awaruite. It holds a 100% interest in five nickel properties, four of which are located in British Columbia (Decar, Wale, Orca, Klow), and one located in the Yukon Territory (Mich). The Company’s primary project is the Baptiste deposit (Baptiste or the Project) located within its flagship Decar Nickel District (Decar). The Mich property is located approximately 55 kilometers (kms) southeast of Whitehorse in the southern Yukon Territory. The Orca property is located approximately 35 kms east of Dease Lake and nine km from the Eagle target on the adjoining to Wale property. Klow Property is located approximately 120 kms northwest of Fort St. James and 55 kms north of the Decar Nickel District.


TSXV:FPX - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by AlternativeViewon Jun 11, 2018 11:42am
78 Views
Post# 28154486

A Better Approach To Cost Comparison

A Better Approach To Cost ComparisonEarly this morming I attempted to convert USD production cash costs to a CAD equivalent and accidentally inverted the USD/CAD conversion factor.  I did this because the cost numbers were presented in CAD in the 2013 PEA.  A better approach is to dump the CAD and compare production costs in terms of USD.

In 2018 we have $6,000 USD per tonne / 2,204 =  $2.72 USD per pound.

In 2013 we had $3.23 CAD per pound at an exhange rate of 97 cents.

So at the time the PEA was produced the USD cost of production was 0.97 * 3.23 = $3.13 USD per pound.

View in this way, it appears that FPX has achieved a cost reduction of $3.13 - $2.72 = 41 cents per pound.  This works out to a 13% cost reduction per pound.
Bullboard Posts