RE:RE:RE:JV from KL or a major coming?Contact Mark Utting. The reason was to re-gain their 18.1 % stake and the opportunity came through the Artemis desire to dispose of their shares to KL. FACT. He is very approachable and a great IR guy. Yes I know KL is not an ETF... I also speak for many, who have enough of sinking in nearly $ 100 M when the funds could go to Shaft # 4 project at Macassa. JIN
MacStockMarket wrote: Companies like KL are not ETF's or Like Instruments where they need to refloat or rebalance.
The KL purchase was an opportunity to aquire another sum of shares in a private transaction.
The shares available were defined by the seller, not the buyer. Therefore the percentages are irrelevant. IR, will always provide a simple matter of fact explaination for every transaction. That is their job.
I am also a holder of KL shares, so when you make statements like, "We KL shareholders have ample NVO exposure now and don't want any more!" You are speaking for yourself, not on behalf of all of the "KL Shareholders"
You are right though in the fact that ES reads these boards.
Cheers,