RE:RE:Hi Mark...Thank-you for your reply Mark, it is appreciated. I guess what I was asking was a little bit of both...what the exchange is going to do with a bit of formal flavour thrown in. Believe me, it is not the intention of any shareholder to cause you (CSE) to be dismayed because of questions pitched; at least not anymore dismayed and frustrated than what investors already are. As someone already mentioned; the smaller exchanges in Canada are representative of the "wild west"...it is well known fact that Canadian investors are at a serious disadvantage; and there are plenty of feature articles from Forbes to Bloomberg dating back to the old days of Howe street to where it is today...there is a continuing occurrence of scams, swindles and market manipulations. Take for example; multiple trading platforms in which you may be trading a stock on one platform, that same stock is being traded on a multiple of other trading platforms at the exact same time. This not only removes transparency especially for the average retail investor, but it also removes visible liquidity for any particular stock which makes manipulation ripe; and that includes stocks that are listed on the CSE. Unless you’re a professional trader or trading firm paying astronomical amounts of money for consolidated real-time market data, you’re not trading with the right information. Even with the removal of the uptick rule allowing manipulation through short-selling to the obvious spoofing/layering that is allowed to go on etc. Yes, you are right; I answered my own question…but the question was pitched to you; as shareholders...through our frustration are voicing our concerns even if they are repetitive...hoping you stand by your policies...we’re asking for you to see things through our eyes…and yes, we are dismayed and frustrated at what is obvious! My rant...