Co2 Solutions Inc COSLF

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:New warrants for GasTran-good but what about other warrants

[HyperCube]

HealthyPlanet wrote: 20x's smaller and 5x's faster translates to a much smaller capex and a much less expensive capture cost directly tied to the size of the plant. The bigger the plant the greater the savings. It might take more power to get the rpb up to higher rotations/minute but should be a lot more efficient which should reduce operational expense dramatically as it will be capable of more co2 capture in a less time frame.
Hence, a smaller rotator will be much more efficient and less costly to build. Smaller + increased efficiency = smaller capex and opex.

Yes, but the RPB has some extra costs of its own. A big tank isn't all that expensive. A motor adds costs. A tank that spins needs to be built stronger than a fixed tank. Then you have the seals which will wear and tear. It is smaller but more complex. Overall, I do think the RPB will cost less to operate. But I don't think that is the important advantage it has over the packed tower. I thnk its smaller size making it easier to install in space limited factories is its real advantage.