RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Sky betting dealCould be either way, as I noted - depends on what is in the detail - either way, the 'nett' price of the deal should remain the same.
But, I agree, allowing a cash grab while there are still significant borrowings doesn't make sense. In the M&A deal I referenced in earlier posts, there was not a large imbalance either way, so paying out the debt (but collecting the cash) was the seller's role, not inherited by the buyer.