GREY:VDQSF - Post by User
Comment by
Vodisisnotrealon Jun 29, 2018 6:42pm
73 Views
Post# 28254476
RE:RE:Hc vodis pending approval
RE:RE:Hc vodis pending approvalIts the same narrative.
When Smartmoney originally disclosed Ivan’s slight of hand regarding the intent for HC to set up an inspection and fire dept as has been the case with any of the currently licensed organizations they made an executive decision to not arrange anything techhnically leaving the buracracy as a pending matter. Curcumstantial evidence points to this in that companies that started after the najority have alresdy ontained cultivation and sales license some only retain a cultivation license. Nevertheless the consensus is that nothing has materialized with the current direction management is choosing. Further more the very prospectus hilights Vodis as a turnkey operation. This is like a microbrewery with a brewing club. You would think or hope. Instead they operate with a branding initiative which is great if your brand was VIRGIN MOBILE or TRUMP. Where the business obtains warrants or debentures that are normally convertible like a bond on some conditional focal point; example 2 years or $1 whatever comes first.
Instead the licensing model operates more like a front so Ivan and insider can operate in Washington. Except they have no stake in the weed or the cash collected. This is what gives the smart money pause. If Ivan and the board is found to have taken proceeds from their tenants operation then its questionable in terms of ethics. If Ivan was doing this then the RCMP inconjunction with homeland security would bring down the racket.
So instead we assume things are legal and on the books.
Which is dire.
If one reviews the statements the debt load is unsustainable and rental income is not going to increase as per the terms of the lease to the tents.
So the tenants are collecting the profists from the actual weed.
If Ivan is financing his questionable lifestyle with cash proceeds the cash doesn’t move through the company it just goes into those involved as a consultation payment which in the statements you will find Lotz did a great job moving the terms around and technically nothing illegal is goingnon. however shareholders are again denied benefit as the margins don’t change.
The following should happen
-Ivan should be fired and stripped of any access to any of the premises
-restatements should be filed in order to understand why the organization remains in this state of arrested development
-The board should find a new CEO with experience in the industry and bring this to a vote by the end of the 3rd 1/4
-delta should be sold as its not up to code and likely why HC was never followed up on
-The tenants should be bought out with the proceeds of the delta sale
-A NORML attorney should be held on retainer in order to establish a means to get through the buracracy regarding the Health Canada paperwork
-Once these points are established the retained attorneys should be focus on lobbying an exemption so the proceeds from washington can be worked around in a manner that the shareholders can benefit
-washington should then be properly compensated and see their wages increase by 15% as they are being exploited.
The sources to these include the files VODIS puts out. Also their CFO is connected to majhon gaming world and that is easily searchable.
thank you for your time
I know you work hard for your money and you continue to do your dilegence; many people have been taken when they don’t know what their buying.
in Vodis you’re buying a turnkey rental operation massively in debt and planning another round of reverse splits to dilute shareholders. Your are buying the only company that couldn’t get licensed for cultivation and sales and you’re buying the CEO who is a habitual failure. The culture of the organization spreads to the abrassive and antagonistic nature of the his friends taking advantage of the low float.
As it stands anyone who backtests to the last go of reverse splits has lost more than 70% of their investment.
This isn’t like $DRYS where there’s enough volume and shares to risk a pop; it has no volume because same types of companies exists with far less risk and have the same potentiL.