RE:RE:RE:RE:This was the closure we ve been waiting for six monthsalphabetting wrote: How exactly is that “breaking securities law” They aren’t obligated to release $hit and I didn’t say they secured $20 million you did.
Dont believe my “theory”. Makes no difference to me.
Is it not a theory? Do you have any proof of this at all?
You said “
The funds for the other two tranches have been secured but they are waiting till after the spinoff.”
This has not been disclosed to shareholders. You either are pulling this out of thin air or have been told by an insider. The first one is most realistic, making your post useless. The second and I highly doubt you have someone “in the know” would be illegal.
You really think it’s legal for them to tell YOU they have secured TWO additional trenches while putting a NR out to the public and the rest of their investors stating they have only completed half of what they originally were working on closing (5vs10mill).
If you think it’s legal for them to delay a NR like this to the public but inform some small investor like yourself you are just plan wrong.
By all means pump SX....I have a lot invested here...just pump accurate information. No need misleading people with false hope only to get them frustrated because your “theory” (or did I miss this in a NR?) wasn’t accurate.