Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Gunnison Copper Corp T.GCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  GCUMF

Gunnison Copper Corp., formerly Excelsior Mining Corp., is a copper development company. The Company operates in Cochise County, Arizona, and is focused on delivering pure copper cathode into the United States domestic supply chain. The Company’s projects include Gunnison Copper Project, the Johnson Camp Mine, and a portfolio of exploration projects, including the Peabody Sill and the Strong and Harris deposits, in Cochise County, Arizona. The Strong and Harris copper-zinc-silver deposit is located just 1.3 miles (2.4 kilometers) north of Gunnison Copper’s Johnson Camp SX-EW facility. The Gunnison Project which incorporates a large open pit of predominantly copper oxide mineralization approximately two kilometers south of Johnson Camp Mine (JCM). The Project is a copper cathode and is designed to produce around 167 million pounds of copper cathode annually.


TSX:GCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by ArizonaBillyon Jul 13, 2018 12:36pm
167 Views
Post# 28312897

Here's the Facts

Here's the FactsMs. Rock had three objections.  The first had to do with compliance with the NEPA.

Here's what the EPA's website says about that:

“The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was one of the first laws ever written that establishes the broad national framework for protecting our environment. NEPA's basic policy is to assure that all branches of government give proper consideration to the environment prior to undertaking any major federal action that significantly affects the environment.

NEPA requirements are invoked when airports, buildings, military complexes, highways, parkland purchases, and other federal activities are proposed.”

The Gunnison project is not an undertaking of the federal government, therefore, in my opinion, the first objection of Sharon Rock doesn’t make sense.
 
Regarding the Lesser Long Nosed Bat and the Chiricahua Leopard Frog.  In April 2018 the EPA removed the Lesser Long Nosed Bat from the list of endangered species. My reading of the Federal Register dated March 20, 2012 regarding the frog, indicates that the area encompassing the Gunnison project is not designated as “critical habitat” of the frog. 
 
Ms. Rock should have done her research.  A simple Google search would have uncovered what I found as noted in my comments here.
 
Regarding her third issue.  It only reflects her opinion and has no scientific basis at all.

As always, do your own due diligence.
 

Bullboard Posts