RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:How much money have you lost ...Bigbirdofbayst1 wrote: TFSAfunds wrote: Goodfella1 wrote: I would certainly agree on some of Lucas post. However when shareholders are involved they are forced to do an investigation into the individuals posts. That has not changed.
TFSAfunds wrote: Goodfella1 ... how am I wrong? Explain please ...
I wasn't refering to Lucas's post! What was in my post that was "Wrong" ...???
I must ask, how many shares does "Goodfella1" own? Zero ... right. "Goodfella1" is not a shareholder! Now if John Smith uses "Goodfella1" as an alias... it's still John Smith who owns the shares ... right? , not "Goodfella1". "Goodfella1" DOES NOT EXIST and therefore cannot be libeled nor slandered ... unless you have made it abundantly clear to everyone out there that you John Smith, a real person, are "Goodfella1".
you are stupid right . All a lawyer needs or a judge is your ipo address . Via cell phone or computer . Emails can be used multiple different times. But that email and user names comes from the owners phone or computer . Any of you trolls dosent tho k bylaw they can't get you . Then i would think again . If u are served for a court hearing I highly recommen a good lawyer . But then again it wouldent matter as all the proof is in your guys posts . Simple all terms regulation are there black and white . I posted the legal team that's has won countless of times . Just from people like you . That use slander defamatory remarks on compaines and other posters In general .
KohKut ... this is what started it! BB, in his arrogance attacked me. Game on until I get an apology from him!