Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Enbridge Income Fund Holdings Inc. EBGUF

"Enbridge Income Fund Holdings Inc is engaged in the generation, transportation and storage of energy through its green power generation facilities, liquids transportation and storage facilities."


GREY:EBGUF - Post by User

Comment by autofocus111on Aug 10, 2018 12:32am
115 Views
Post# 28437968

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Growth without dropdowns?

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Growth without dropdowns?Yeah I seem to recall reading that once upon a time, and iell if that's what it is that's just fine. In any case, back to my question... say ENF was to propose buying a $1B stake in the now Canada-owned TransMountain Pipeline  project, and issues shares and maybe debt to raise the neccesary funds. I don't see why ENB would object to that. My point here being that there should still be the possibility of growth for ENF without ENB dropdowns. Or am I missing something?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>