RE:RE:RE:just a thoughtThis company doesn't have a management problem. It has a shareholder problem. And it will continue to have a shareholder problem so long as you take guidance from ignoramuses like lou and goodheart.
The company can only finance its business activities through the sale of share. At each and every turn, for years now, shareholders have shot themselves in the foot by blocking management's effort to finance the company.
There is a reason that I referred to the going concern statement in the financials. It is a concise statement of the status of the company. "The Company has a need for equity capital and financing for working capital and exploration and evaluation of its properties. Because of continuing operating losses and a working capital deficit the Company’s continuance as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain adequate financing and to reach profitable levels of operation."
Some years ago, the company requested shareholder consent for share consolidation. It was denied, repeatedly. The result? The share price is mired in "the penny trap". The value increment between the bid and ask is 50% of the bid price. Good luck breaking through that wall.
As an alternative to share consolidation, management conceived of the multiple voting share, which was a direct way out of the penny trap. It took a couple of tries, and despite the ignoramus chorus, it did get passed. But shareholders did not avail themselves of the opportunity to trade shares at incremental values of 50%/300, or 0.17% per value increment. As I already mentioned, anyone selling subordinate shares at 0.01 is leaving significant money on the table. There are about 60,000,000 subordinate shares equivalent trading in the multiple voting share marketplace, but the only reason why everyone hasn't converted is because of misleading information provided by ignoramus lou and goodheart.
All recent financings have been in multiple voting shares, and there has been significant insider participation. Without management's personal support, this company would have died already.
Now Frank wants your permission to access a different type of financial investment in your company. He needs arrows in his quiver, tools in his toolbox, to raise money. There is no magical saviour to ride in on a white horse to save KWG from its shareholders. I see vultures circling. Noront tried to impede KWG's financing opportunities. Think about why, and then think about how you can help your company proceed with developing its assets.
I'm talking totally from the perspective of running a junior explorer. Nothing I've said should be seen as being in support for management, except in the sense of financing opportunities being denied by shareholders who prefer shooting themselves in the foot, and then complaining that they're having trouble walking.