OTCPK:NWKRF - Post by User
Comment by
silkroad007on Aug 28, 2018 4:06pm
67 Views
Post# 28531864
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:IGNORE THE NOISE
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:IGNORE THE NOISETruth - not trying to get in the middle of this as you and I have traded comments before but if you dont have an agenda where were you the last week when this was running? You seem to pop up daily when there are red days.
You can write elequently but you write paragraphs for things that only need one sentence. Fancy quotes and anlaogies but is there true substance and new facts? I feel you hide behind this percieved intelligence and diatrides but it doesnt hide the fact you are posting on red days and noticably absent on green days. That seems more like an agenda than a bleeding heart truth teller.
TruthAboutHip wrote: Stockmoves wrote:
"you cant fix stupid..."
That is why I worry about you and your predictions and your overblown sense of self worth and how you are desperately trying to sell it to others. Your "predictions" are quite simply hedged and rehedged and then rehedged again to the point where you will always have a position which could turn out to be true. You might be fooling the punters here but you don't fool me in the least.
Why not cut to the chase if you are such a brilliant visionary and tell us all your prediction as to when this stock will actually hit something in the neighbourhood of say $1 and then $1.50 and then $2 ? Accurate timeline please, not your trademark "back and forth" with justification as to why you were wrong. Nostradamus already tried this parlour trick and yet there are many who buy into the legend. So no "you cant fix stupid..." but you can try to be realistic and ask real questions.
Well we both know that you can't provde the prediction I requested because the market is incredibly volatile and simply impossible to predict. So why don't you stop pumping your own image to others here and be responsible. People will listen to what they want to hear and you are giving it to them on a very slippery and clumsily gilded platter.
You have claimed earler to have sold all of your common shares and only hold A warrants. Well that seems to me to be a very "short" position indeed. Long and short are relative terms and of course you play both ends of the semantic spectrum on this to your full advantage.
Twisty logic is not to be trusted. Especially when the "logician" explains to you that he is absolutely correct but the problem is that it is beyond your comprehension level.