Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd. T.KGI


Primary Symbol: T.KL

Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd is a Canada-based gold mining, development, and exploration company with a diversified portfolio of exploration projects. The production profile of the company includes the Macassa mine complex located in northeastern Ontario and the Fosterville gold mine located in the State of Victoria, Australia. Also, the company owns the Holt mine and the Detour mine. The company's mines and material mineral projects are located in Canada and Australia.


TSX:KL - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by PulpCutteron Aug 29, 2018 1:41pm
53 Views
Post# 28536959

RE:RE:RE:RE:KL could be buying own shares at these prices

RE:RE:RE:RE:KL could be buying own shares at these pricesIMO, this is the biggest concern with KL by a mile, and it was when the shares were over $30.  My previous posts will verify that. 

Particularly with regard to Novo.  As far as I can tell, the sum total of due diligence done before the initial buy of Novo shares was Tony Makuch and a few others walking around the Pilbara with metal detectors.  Stunning.  The initial buy (Newcrest's shares) was at a low price.  We paid for the shares we bought directly from Novo for $58 million.  Then, bizarrely, we paid $5/share - well over market - for Artemis's shares.  This after we had nearly a year down the road of watching Novo screw up, and utterly fail to replicate anything like the high grades shown in August 2017. 

How can one blame institutional investors for being cautious?  It goes to the credibility, or sanity, of company leadership.
Bullboard Posts