Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Invesco Water Resources ETF T.PHO


Primary Symbol: PHO

The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the NASDAQ OMX US Water IndexSM (the underlying index). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index seeks to track the performance of companies that create products designed to conserve and purify water for homes, businesses and industries. The underlying index may include common stocks, ordinary shares, American depositary receipts (ADRs), shares of beneficial interest and tracking stocks. The fund is non-diversified.


NDAQ:PHO - Post by User

Comment by grobinso_1on Aug 30, 2018 11:27pm
195 Views
Post# 28546916

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:FYI

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:FYI It would be helpful to disclose that type of information up front to assist in managing people's expectations.  I am not going to pay $175 to read about an analysts opinion on an equity I own especially on a simple pasted link with no context. 

I can only infer that people who pay that $175 a (presumed yearly fee) are being told about this stock which is fine as far as it goes as a data point, but an unkindness to assume default acccess generally (especially assumed content)

To the point, I hope (myself included) people post either information points or hypothesis based missives with reasonings.

I don't want to make mountains out of mole-hills on this but hey!

Cheers!
Gro
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>