RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:TGIF's day will come ...You're so blind you can't even see the valid points I made. And I know it doesn't matter what I say ... even if said it in Mandarin or another language you don't understand you'd still try to shoot it down ... because that's what you do to everyone lol. You're blinded by the fact that EVE is focusing on women. If they were focussing on men, you'd probably think that's just fine. I own five very different MJ stocks, so your whatever little story you've envisioned in your head about why I chose EVE as one (1) of the
five (5) MJ stock I've invested in are merely wrong assumptions. Assumptions are useless. Go on your merry way. I'll be sure never to respond to another post by you since it's a waste of effort and my time is too valuable.
BaitingBateman wrote: Couldn't just agree to disagree eh? Lol. The feminist force is strong with this one. Blind you it has.
Foxx248 wrote: Regarding your statement:
BaitingBateman wrote: - solely sex-based production of commercial and commodified products is not only outrageous, but compeltely unacceptable.
...that's one of the most ridiculous statements I've ever heard. Products geared to either men or women are "outrageous"? There are countless examples in the marketplace ... jock straps, bras, feminine hygeine products ... to mention just some of the obvious ones.
And of course: https://www.rogaine.com/products/mens-hair-regrowth-solutions (NOTE: that's a "
men's hair regrowth solutions")