Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Newcrest Mining Ltd NCMGF


Primary Symbol: A.NCM

Newcrest Mining Limited is an Australia-based mining company. The Company's principal activities are exploration, mine development, mine operations and the sale of gold and gold/copper concentrate. The Company owns and operates a portfolio of brownfields and greenfields exploration projects. The Company’s assets include Brucejack, Cadia, Havieron, Lihir, Red Chris, Telfer and Wafi-Golpu. The Brucejack asset is located approximately 950 kilometers (km) from Vancouver, Canada. The Cadia asset is located approximately 25 km from Orange, New South Wales (NSW). The Havieron asset is located approximately 45 km east of Telfer. The Lihir asset is located on the Niolam Island, approximately 900 km from Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea (PNG). The Red Chris asset is located approximately 1,700 km from Vancouver, Canada. The Telfer asset is located approximately 400 km from Port Hedland, WA. The Wafi-Golpu asset is located approximately 65 km from the city of Lae, PNG.


ASX:NCM - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by miningmanon Sep 11, 2018 6:33pm
181 Views
Post# 28600841

Bossu's Questions and ore reserves

Bossu's Questions and ore reservesThe answer to "what do we do with that "  is unfortunately ,  to assume .  that several millions of  unanticipated  dollars will have to be allocated to legal defence because   regardless  of the legitimacy or otherwise   of these class action suits,   it will not be cheap  to provide defence in  courts of   law.


And   before anyone choses to post more irrelevant opinion consider this.  The term  "high grading"  can have three totally separate  meanings........both legally and geologically.

To suggerst that PVG has been chasing Cleopatra  and similiar structures  to provide a short term boost to mined grades is almost certainly  false.  In theory they might have done a little bit
of exploraraty drifting   but tonnage generated would have been inconsequential  and  I would think easily be dismissed in a court of law.

Unfortunately   the much publicized definition drilling and grade control exercizes  could be charactrerized by  a   legal team  as a form of high grading.   PVG  is almost certainly  doing one of two things with this extra  stope drilling..

OPtion A  is defining areas of  pre engineered stoping blocks  which seem to be localized areas of waste  and  /or ver low grade....   say below  4-5 gram.    By  not   blasting  these areas ,  grade at the drawpoints  is definitely improved  and these non-economic tonnes remain underground.  Everybody is happy ,  right????   Well  only untill the   revised ore reserves are published  because the tonnes that remain   definitely were  in the last  ore reserve  figure and therefore represent both tonnes and ounces that   are now effectively recognized as being non existent.  It has been suggested  by others on this board  that  it might be about 20%  of stope tonnages that  might be identified  as sub economic.   ..... say about 100,000  tonnes per  6 months.


Option  B   might identify  entire stoping blocks  which  ,  with the extra drilling done .  might now be defined as completely  uneconomic.   It   wouldnt be too difficult for   mine planners to completely  drop these blocks from the mine plan.  It could almost  easily be   justified  in order to  improve head grades in the short term.  Depending on how aggressive  the reserve geologists are.  these tonnes  and ounces could remain in the reserves........ altho  the liklihood of ever accessing them in the future is very low.

So either way,  when the new reserves are published.  there could be  dramatic  loss of ounces.    This new figure is supposedly being prodiuced before xmas.    Remember   even by PGG's own admission there was an  incostincey of around 20%   in  Q4   produced ounces relative to reserve grade.

  
Multiple factors at lpay here.   Q3   production at 14.5   gram plus would go someway to eliminating  these concerns  but  grades of only  10-12  grams would be  viewed very unfavourably. 

Exploration sucess mighjt offset  these lost ounces but  I believe most  of recent drilling has been infill/ definition drilling  that is unlikely to provide  significant ounces.
Bullboard Posts