You have every right to question the NPV of Timok.
But if I get to a discounted NPV of X does it necessarily matter whether or not those cash flows are heavily front end loaded?
If anything, I could argue it might be an investors dream. If Lundin wants to drag out the production they could do what they want? Does that mean it should justify a lower valuation on a buyout? And if the answer is NO according to you, then just leave the NSU shareholder to our own devices meaning we can go it alone as Lundin’s offer was essentially unsolicited.
Also, how about the rest of their assets? The fact that Zijin’s offer blows Lundin’s offer out of the water would suggest that your analysis was far too conservative.
I’m actually of the opinion, that despite blowing Lundin out of the water, Zijin’s offer still heavily undervalues NSU’s assets. So that’s where I’m coming from.
You also didn’t address what I think was a great point by me. So Lundin lost Timok the first time around to NSU but then I guess realized they were actually willing to offer a whole lot more 2 years later?
The more I think about it the sillier it sounds which leads me to point more to a failure of Lundin management to capitalize on an opportunity for value creation than towards discipline.