RE:RE:RE:liquidity eventInfidel_ wrote: ThinkPlease wrote: Maybe your opinion deserves some consideration, but not when you include falsehoods.
Sprott can't sell a share that he doesn't report to SEDI. He can't trickle them out. He's in for the long haul. He made his bet, and it rides.
Hole 9 and 10 were intentionally drilled as twins, in order to collect suffficient sulphides for metallurgical testing. I look forward to metallurgical news, along with drill results.
I don't use a crystal ball, though. I'll wait for some evidence.
How is it a falsehood re Sprott? Just because he’s an insider doesn’t me he can’t sell. Yes he has to file but so what? You don’t know if it rides or not. Just cited a possible. And also noted that he won’t be buying.
didnt say anything about motivation re spacing
you just chickened out of replying with that lame cop out
Do you not understand your own rhetoric? You said, "...in fact, (Sprott) might feel he is overweight and take some off the table..." He has clearly stated otherwise. And even if he had not stated it plainly, he has no practical options. Of course he might sell, but he would destroy his own investment. Probable and possible are quite different. Using "in fact" in front of a low probability event is misleading. Your sophistry was caught and exposed.
You also called the twin holes "spin or tricks" in your original post. What is that if it's not about motivation?
Try not to squirm so much next time you're busted.