palinc2000 wrote: Dwizell wrote: I realy think everything is perfect. Increase in sales on egrifta , new formulation that will help raise the sales even more ( And decrease the cogs) .
The lunch of trogarzo is very good the sales progess very well, Europe is on the line and without too much cost ahead ... insurances coverage going week and we even made a profit !
But the stock is still totaly manipulate with the help of the thief working at rbc. Even with today’s great results and perspectives we are below the price we were before his malicious report and +\_ 35% from recent hights. We can’t barely keep the post approval level ...
I am very happy with everything happening with th but totaly frustrated with the behavior of the stock price !
The notion that shorts are involved is probably accurate
The notion that RBC is somewhat involved in shorting or working with the shorts is pure nonsense
I beleive most of the shorts are related to the convert but there is some evidence that some are shorting THERF in an attempt to make a trading profit. Whatever case they had, it pretty much just got blown up. While RBC is not likely involved, I would not rule it out entirely. The report from RBC was so strange and out of consensus yet written by a smart guy, that it does raise a legitimate question of whether or not they might be supporting a client who is short. RBC today raised their price target to C$12 from C$11 and maintained a "Hold" rating on TH. Given the roughly 35% upside in the stock based on their own price target, that would seem to justify a :"Buy" rating. That the analyst did not raise his rating with that upside only raises suspicions. That the analyst did not raise his sales and EPS forecasts more is also dubious. He is a smart guy so his willingness to write up such a dubious report in the first place and his unwillingness to correct his errors now (including the math error noted earlier) means you can't fully rule out the short issue.
So we have our respond .. he is the leader of the guild of theives ....
is RBC itself involved ? This has to be determined .....
So furstrating ...