RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Share priceStocksFTB wrote: better products don't always win
VP4 = BetaMax, indeed.
In the end, we won't know if a different/better Leader/CEO/BOD would have yielded any different results. Maybe Rumble
is the right person for the job but the industry has no appeal to adopt from a maverick company with no reputation.
Perhaps this technology is already antiquated. It's not new; this is 1990's technology. TSO3 has simply been lazy and slow and
Quebec-ish during this journey. I think someone smarter over at J&J or Steris or {fill-in-the-blank} may be close to their own more-evolved technologies which don't possess any patent infringement on TSO3's IP and will be easier for them to replace their own legacy devices already installed within their established customer base.
Who wants to buy from a non-proven no-name like "TSO3" when they can have comfort and confidence when buying from J&J?
The best thing for this stock, our investments and this technology is for us to be acquired by a giant.
-AE