Heritage Cannabis Holdings Corp TRJTF

Primary Symbol: HERTF

Healthcare Cannabis

Heritage Cannabis Holdings Corp. is a Canada-based cannabis company offering products to both the medical and recreational legal cannabis markets in Canada and the United States. It focuses on extraction and the creation of extract and extract-derivative products and brands for adult use and cannabis-based medical solutions. It has a portfolio of cannabis products under the brands Purefarma, Pura Vida, RAD, Premium 5, Thrifty, Adults Only, feelgood., the CB4 suite of medical products in Canada and ArthroCBD in the United States. In Canada, it operates through its subsidiaries, Heritage Cannabis West Corporation (Heritage West) and Heritage Cannabis East Corporation (Heritage East). Heritage West holds a Health Canada issued cultivation, processing, and medical and adult use sales license, as well as an industrial hemp license, a cannabis oil sales license, and a cannabis research license. In the United States, it operates through, Opticann Inc., an oral and topical cannabinoid company.

PINL:HERTF - Post by User

Heritage Cannabis Holdings Corp

Bullboard Posts

Comment by PumperStalkeron Oct 15, 2018 7:23pm

26 Views

Post# 28806147

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Pumpy...Can you please tell us where you see bullsh*t ?

True enough.. If they want to argue with HC and they get the green light, great. More revenue to Heritage. :)

DiligentSon wrote: No, a likeness is a picture or rendering.

PumperStalker wrote: 'celebrity likeness isnt used' I guess that can include a recognizable celebs name.

Like I said, I think it's a stupid archaic HC rule but, it is what it is and hopefully they will drop it once US goes legal as I'm pretty sure they will market the hell out of product down there which will give Can a reciprocal effect once the Feds down there give the green light :)

DiligentSon wrote: Its not really "getting away with it". A brand is a brand and that's all it is. As long as a celebrity likeness isnt used, and the celebrity isnt publicly endorsing use, then it is nothing more than a recognizable brand and they are within they are within the limits of the regulations.

PumperStalker wrote: I think they were one of the first to be cautioned but then again if they get away with it, all the power to them.

Personally I think it's one of the dumbest regulations HC has come out with but it is what it is.

DiligentSon wrote:
How about Canopy using Snoop's name? Yes there will be restrictions just as their is on alcohol. But there are ways to circumvent that, just like alcohol.