Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Royal Nickel Corp. RNKLF



GREY:RNKLF - Post by User

Comment by marben100on Oct 22, 2018 10:35am
172 Views
Post# 28847160

RE:RE:Too much gold to count

RE:RE:Too much gold to countTwo comments on this:

"too much gold to count" is NOT what the NR says - it just says it's taking  longer to finalise the figure. We'll have to wait & see whether it comes in within, above or below the 30-35koz promised. Somewhere in that range would be fine with me, as long as we also get to know what the result of removing the second slab was and of the second blast (if it's taken place, which has not yet been confirmed). We knew already that there were "large volumes of coarse gold".

Secondly, assuming visible gold over the entire 500m seems overoptimistic to me. An average grade of over 10g/t over that strike would be fine with me (and would put to bed fears that the initial blast was a one-off and there's not much more high-grade gold to be found). Anything above that is a bonus, in my eyes.

Suggest people are cautious about making overoptimistic comments: the share price may fall if folks expect too much and those expectations aren't met. Better to be pleasantly surprised to the upside than to be disappointed.

Cheers,
Mark
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>