Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Royal Nickel Corp. RNKLF



GREY:RNKLF - Post by User

Comment by RallyOptimiston Oct 24, 2018 4:14pm
196 Views
Post# 28866729

RE:trying to find out why "good" report pushed RNX down.

RE:trying to find out why "good" report pushed RNX down.I think people are confused maybe about the fact that RNC is still performing conventional mining away from the Father's Day find. This in turn results in a dilution of the average of the exploration Father's day find. In  other words you end up with the silly looking figure of 6.67 g per ton total instead of the ounces per ton record breaking results of the Father's day find. Wake up people this is the find of the century who cares about the conventional mining results.


mingzhu wrote: gold production of 31,360 "includes 6,206 ounces of coarse gold and 2,390 ounces of specimen gold". 31360-6206-2390=22764

but gold grade is 6.67 compared to 2.24 last year.


Gold mined grade (g/t)3,4

6.67

2.24



Is this the reason. you have 3x higher grade, production is only doubled from 10489 last year to 22764.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>