RE:RE:RE:C$745,000 Plasma Torch System Contract with European EntityI was rereading this TKC and was considering your "who would do that" comment in order to respnd appropriately. "Novel concepts" suggests ideas that might lead to interesting and profitable outcomes and Pyrogenesis can not, (and should not) do everything. If this technology really has legs, the best way is to generate relationships with "ideas" people, not large organizations. If managed properly and it seems that we do have management that understands, this company could be the new "General Electric Corporation" only a lot more profitable. Two key word sets are "first right of refusal" and "no royalties". This means that Pyrogenesis has first rights to set up any business where the opportunity is reasonable, and it has no overhead going forward that its competitors might have. Quite a leg up, don't you agree.
This corporation could conceivably have a larger profit each year than its current stock market capitalization.
The naysayers are pointing to the past where Pyrogenesis trusted the US Navy to act honestly. Obviously they did not and delayed the implementation of an obviously good solution in order to drive this small company into receivership and "steal" the assets. You all must know tthis as this is the only non-US manufactured produst on a carrier and any devious means might be expected from the higher level decision makers to bring this technolory "home". Current management used that technology and, just in time, changed business direction, and it appears saved itself.