Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Royal Nickel Corp. RNKLF



GREY:RNKLF - Post by User

Post by actionguyon Oct 27, 2018 12:10am
265 Views
Post# 28881514

why even mention "substantially"

why even mention "substantially"After screwing up the grade of the 2 boulders,which in turn screws up the 30-35k ozs guesstimation,why not just shut up and say the mining continues along the 540 meters .  .  "RNC now expects 27-30,000 ounces of gold from the immediate Father's Day Vein area and substantially more than 35,000 ounces from the 540 metres of A Zone sediment structures identified to date" .  just shut up guesstimating and just release the numbers when they come in.   also,what does the word substantially mean?   45k ozs?  55 kozs?  75k ozs? 100k ozs?   everytime i read that news release i find another stupid wording in it. Eric Sprott was confused,most on sh are confused,most ,most on ceo ca are confused. sending a scathing email to r n c  this weekend. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>