RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Revenue ModelI agree with the importance of a large LP to validate the product. Of course it's true that revenues will ultimately dictate the price, but do not think that they have missed the train. In fact I think tech and ancillary cannabis companies are just getting started. Blockstrain only IPO'd 5 months ago. What they have accomplished is very impressive. We should keep in mind that LPs are still getting their feet wet and need to dedicate time to evaluate the product. The software solution put forward is applicable and valuable on many levels and Investors will be drawn to potential value... Assuming that they can land an LP/government and provide a sound revenue model. We are just at the beginning imo.
LaserStock29 wrote: Well that's the beauty of government contracts. If it's as big as said financing as a starter. That's really positive. Although I'm not sure what a legit number is for a govt contract. For the concept of revs before pps. I'm more interested in whether canopy or aurora pick this up Both have contracts in Poland and thus the EU. intergovernmental regulations and agreements on legal presidents with product is incredibly important. Blockstrain solves this Speculation hoping is rife if said catalysts fruit.
fic73 wrote: I think the hype is over and Blockstrain has already missed that train. Now the compnaies will most probably be valued based on their revenue.
There are couple of catalysts ; govt contracts and the validity of 97/5000. Especially govt contarct or validity with a big company can push the price long way.
IMO the announcemnets of contracts will gradully push the price. However It will take time for blockstrain to show the revenue.