RE:sea tunnel route realignmenthighper wrote: The 2018 program successfully tested the down plunge projection of the Iron Cap core zone, assessed the distribution of post-mineral intrusions on the south end of the Iron Cap deposit and obtained data for the re-alignment of the proposed MTT to avoid conflicts with mining operations.
MTT stands for tunnel. right?
MTT is the Mitchell-Treaty Tunnell. It sounds like they expect high grade gold to extend into the current tunnel route and will need to ensure they maximize their mining potential by finding the best tunnel route up to the end of the Iron Cap mineralization. My guess is that the tunnel route in Treaty Creek remains the same.
However, if they need to change the route all the way up to the T/C boundary it would be very interesting. I would interpret that as a sign of possible higher grade gold all the way up to the T/C boundary. The implication would be that mineralization might continue west of the Sulphurets Thrust Fault (STF) right into T/C. Seabridge has made no comments on the stretch of land north of the North Iron Cap Fault (NICF) to the west of where it intersects the STF. They have said that the Iron Cap mineralization ends at the NICF to the east of the STF. But they must have looked at the other side of the STF fault as well. Since they haven't drilled up there, can't say anything for sure. We'll wait to see how they change the tunnel route, then pick up the conversation based on that.