RE:RE:RE:Why do you like (still) Novo?Geologist I agree -if there is one positive from the Novo story it is the amount of exploration funding and expertise now being focussed on the Pilbara. Novo obviously have a role to play and will over time if the conglomerates dont prove to be economically viable possibly transition to hard rock gold settings and/or other commodities. Or they will spit the dummy and head off to Alaska because no matter what they do in the Pilbara unless they get very lucky their market cap is unsustainable. Given their cash I would say about 50c is around the mark but if that happens as I fully expect there will only be you and I mate -the rest will have flown the coop. Artemis are there for the long haul and are spoilt for choice in a rapidly emerging poly metallic province and current management look solid - a no nonsense team set to bring home the bacon. Importantly we have Radio Hill with the Gekko plant that will systematically define the gold recovery characteristics of gold in the conglomerates but will also be a valuable plant to process other ore types -along with a first class sulphide circuit -and we know now there are sulphides in the Karratha conglomerate (including PGMs at Karratha if field reports are accurate) the same as Beatons Creek. DEG look good and many in the rear of the field like CZR with a top geologist like Dr Rob Ramsay - one of Mark Creasys trusted lieutenants homing in on some very interesting geological concepts after their recent field program at Croydon. The structural gold potential of the Pilbara -plus the lithium -cobalt -copper -zinc and other commodity potential is very substantial but funding in this market is a tough call. Finally give the rabble a miss -lets discuss matters of substance and let the howler monkeys chatter away in the tree tops amongst themselves :-)