RE:RE:Answer from IR re reverse splitYou could have not said it better Transporter, i was just about to comment on the possible reverse split. Every shareholder here is thinking it but yet to proud to say it, Fowler is to blame....say it, trust me you will feel better. Take a look at the other LP's that compete with Supreme, take a look at their revenue, look at their market cap, yet FIRE is the laggard. I've gone on record about reducing my holdings of Supreme and have sold every time this peaks above $2.25 for a nice profit, I will continue to reduce until I'm out. The reverse split (if it happens) is another reason for me to deploy my profits elsewhere, good luck to those that truly see Supreme somewhere else other than the basement. ***** Transporter said: Problem is this stock should ALREADY be in the $3 to $5 range if they did their fu.cken job at selling this company! Based on their last quarter's sales and waht they'll be able to start producing this January, this should be at minimum a double from today's price. Now they're going to artificially grow the stock price because they're too fu.cken incompetent to manage shareholder value? This is why you don't have rookie CEOs running what should be a billion dollar corporation right now. The Board of Directors should have brought in a heavy gun over a year ago to take the reins and show them how it's done. My vote will remain a firm NO.