Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

FPX Nickel Corp. V.FPX

Alternate Symbol(s):  FPOCF

FPX Nickel Corp. is a Canada-based junior nickel mining company. The Company is focused on the exploration and development of the Decar Nickel District, located in central British Columbia, and other occurrences of the same style of naturally occurring nickel-iron alloy mineralization known as awaruite. It holds a 100% interest in five nickel properties, four of which are located in British Columbia (Decar, Wale, Orca, Klow), and one located in the Yukon Territory (Mich). The Company’s primary project is the Baptiste deposit (Baptiste or the Project) located within its flagship Decar Nickel District (Decar). The Mich property is located approximately 55 kilometers (kms) southeast of Whitehorse in the southern Yukon Territory. The Orca property is located approximately 35 kms east of Dease Lake and nine km from the Eagle target on the adjoining to Wale property. Klow Property is located approximately 120 kms northwest of Fort St. James and 55 kms north of the Decar Nickel District.


TSXV:FPX - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by AlternativeViewon Nov 25, 2018 11:34am
84 Views
Post# 29018835

Was The 8FPX Analytical Method Correct After All?

Was The 8FPX Analytical Method Correct After All?And will the Wale and Orca  properties soon be returning to the menu?

I have posted before on the short-comings of Davis Tube assays ("DTR") but what some may not know is that the earliest assay work was done using a proprietary in-house acid technique called 8FPX.  See Figure 26 on Page 32 for a crossplot of DTR verus 8FPX results.

https://aris.empr.gov.bc.ca/ArisReports/34556.PDF

We see that DTR under-reports fine-grained awaruite by about half.  For fine grain sizes, if 8FPX says .12%, DTR says about .07%.  This discrepancy was what put the Wale and Orca properties far onto the back-burner.

Now if Turenne can come up with a flow-sheet that uses flotation to capture the fine-grained awaruite, will Wale and Orca will be put back in play?  Mich is already in play.

Then the problem will become how to advance all these other properties simultaneously.  Farming them out might be one option.

Further along the timeline, if the revised PEA indicates a low positioning  in the first quartile of the nickel production cost-curve, then all of the FPX propeties, taken together, might be seen as a substantial competitve threat to the laterite nickel market.




Bullboard Posts