OTCPK:KATFF - Post by User
Comment by
bigguy56on Dec 09, 2018 8:21pm
119 Views
Post# 29089754
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:what exactly is the "supply chain" in this case??
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:what exactly is the "supply chain" in this case??
Whatever. I am not even going to ask what THAT means. I have digested one of your prior posts and I have to chirp up as I feel although your posts are usually informative, you are(waaay) off track here. And might I suggest that when you hear government officials talk to Reuters and Bloomberg about "Supply Chain" issues, you might just assume it is no different from any other supply chain. Something indeed nefarious to some degree may be up as the NEWS says. Don't be nave. Those DRC officials ARE CORRECT. These guys ARE GOOD MINING ENGINEERS and they KNOW how to operate in the DRC. ?? well not if they are suggesting $25 Million capital expenditures that are not necessary. I am sure they drilled the f**k out of that ore body and understand it complete. I have no doubt that there are differences in the quality of the ore through out the ore bodie(s) which can be balanced with ORE BLENDING. Just not radiation. Just my guess. If they are mining Open Pit, that would mean the ore body is close to the surface, therefore the would drill before production and know it really well. I worked on a new mine development up in Sudbury and I saw a 3-D model of an ore body years before it was to be mined. The technology may not have been drilling. Truthfully I don't know, I just saw the model. I am sure radiation would have been found. Seriously I would be really interested in any links you can find to support your theory that this radiation would not have been known and that the Supply Chain is primarily the Ore bodie(s) and the link with Ore blending.. it would be much appreciated. I hope this makes sense. Good luck with your positions. These are my views only. Thanks for reading. Seriously we are here to debate, not to prove who is the smartest. We will see how this pans out.