What benefit is there for a R/S to shareholders?Had mgmt at HUGE chosen in August to undertake a 1 for 20 R/S (from 10 cents to $2) before the great 900%+ spike from 10 cents to 94 cents, would the pps have gone on to rocket that 900% from $2 to $18? I doubt it. Mgmt at ISOL also suggested that their R/S would only be feasible if it came with institutional backing. Institutions were nowhere to be seen. Sure, ISOL's outstanding share count was reduced by 10 after the R/S from 30 cents to $3, but what good did that do in preventing the persistent debacles all the way to $1.03 last week? Did ISOL not fare much better on oversold conditions combined with hype between 7 cents and 2.14? And after collapsing from that 2.14 high all the way to 30 cents, would ISOL shareholders not have much preferred to trust hype to carry it beyond $1 once more? What most penny stock investors initially like about a penny stock company is its penny stock price. When penny stock companies facilitate the illusion that they are suddenly large caps after a R/S, investors are brought to realize that the original penny stock premise has gone out the window. What comes about is what is most expected, that is, a lack of trust for post R/S prices, a downturn in investor interest, a non-existent institutional presence and repeated pps debacles. A penny stock R/S, a benefit to shareholders? I'll believe it when I see it. Until that time, I feel much safer buying HUGE, even ISOL, after each debacle to new lows for a 10, 20, 30%+ rebound that is most often sure to come about.