Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Royal Nickel Corp. RNKLF



GREY:RNKLF - Post by User

Post by Antonio Montanaon Dec 17, 2018 7:25pm
270 Views
Post# 29126743

Serious Question re: speculative buyout

Serious Question re: speculative buyout I'm an RNX long and hold a decent position. I'm hoping (like many longs) that we get great drill results and are sitting on a very large gold mine!

I've noticed on this board and on ceo.ca that many are speculating what a buyout would look like should the company decide to sell. 

My question is re: Sprott and a potential KL buyout/(hostile) takeover.

What would benefit him more? A cheap buyout (say $1.xx/share) or having this stock become a 10-20 bagger. 

I'm aware he's a huge shareholder of both RNC and KL. 

What scenerio would be best for him?

Why do I ask? Because he appears to be extremely influencial and will likely get what he's after here (should RNX prove to be sitting on a fortune).

I'm a noob here and just trying to figure this out. Obviously we retail holders would favor a 10-20 bagger and not a cheap buyout.

Thanks in advance to those who have taken the time to answer. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>