starsearcher40 wrote: 55, you need to stop misrepresenting facts.
Absolutely, prior to the Constellation deal I was suggesting the stock could easily go sub $30. Well let's see.
On August 10th it closed at $37.00
On October 13th, it closed at $35.04
On October 14th, it closed at $32.15
Now let's see. that's down about 12% in two days. The stock at that time was collapsing, and sub $30 was totally viable. So the fact of the matter is, the stock was going down, as I had suggested it would.
The Constellation deal came in the next day, and saved the stock from that fate. Good for longs. Too bad the deal wasn't announced one day later. I'm sure I would have been filled sub $30. Oh well.
As for the massive bubble that followed, I wanted no part of it. Bubbles are dangerous and can cause serious damage. My job is to hit singles and doubles, and live to tell another day. Playing bubbles...well.......just ask the guy who bought into the bubble at the middle or top how they feel. Or heck, as yourself how the ride down was. Just as exciting I would imagine. Terror is exciting too.
You seem to think all gains or losses are only Weed specific. Who knows. Maybe that's the only stock you own. So suggesting people are further ahead, or behind is irrelevant. Just so you know, there are more stocks to make money on than just Weed. But hey, that's all part of your severely torqued logic. I won't even try to unravel that mess.
My best wishes 55 in your learning, and maturing as it at least pertains to the market. At present, you only remain at high risk of being chum for the pros.
55orbust wrote: Actually Starcrapper, he would probably be down more money if he listened to you because you were the idiot telling people it was going to go down before the Constellation deal. And at that point it was lower than where it is now. So even with the retracement from 76 to here people are still further ahead if they just ignored you all together. Just stating the facts cockroach
starsearcher40 wrote: Bwayne,
You're absolutely right. I've been saying this stock will go down quite regularly. Since $76.00 I would say that call was quite accurate. Wouldn't you agree?
As for you collecting dollars for each time I've said that it will go down, let's say I've said it 100 times in the past couple of months. (It's not anywhere near that, but this makes for easy math.) . So you would be up $100.00
Well if you had only listened, I think your portfolio value would probably have been up VASTLY more than $100. Fair comment?
Just sayin. ;)
starsearcher40 wrote: Ok, now that's funny. Thanks for the laugh.
TechnicallyHigh wrote: Bwayne420 wrote: Star if I had a dollar for every time you and your other names said this stock was going to tank and not take off I would be rich!! Oh wait I am because I ignored you when you talk to your self on this board.
the only stock looking to implode is BBD how’s your hold till Jan trade on that one working out?
which alias will reply. Star or tech?
Ill let Star reply.. hang on let me go switch accounts.